White papers on the structural problems in development finance.
Collateral fraud, monitoring blind spots, and capital eligibility. Each paper covers one problem and how continuous, verifiable monitoring addresses it.
The 23-Day Gap: Why Quarterly QS Cycles Leave Lenders Blind
Most UK development lenders fund drawdowns monthly and review projects quarterly. Between a drawdown approval and the next QS visit, an average of 23 days passes with no visibility into where funds actually went. This paper covers the three blind spots that creates, and how to close them.
Read the paperThe Contractor Blind Spot: What Your Credit Paper Doesn't Know About the Builder
Credit papers assess the developer thoroughly and the contractor minimally. The contractor builds the project. Each lender only sees their own portfolio, so a contractor overextended across multiple lenders' books is invisible to all of them. This paper explains what cross-portfolio contractor data changes at origination and during the loan.
Read the paperThe Programme Problem: Why SPI and CPI Arrive Too Late to Change Anything
SPI and CPI are the right metrics for development monitoring. The problem is cadence. They arrive every 60 to 90 days. By the time slippage appears in a QS report, it has already compounded. This paper explains how continuous programme monitoring works and what it doesn't replace.
Read the paper